TY - JOUR AU - Sari, Felinda AU - Kristiyanto, Agus AU - Utomo, Tri Aprilijanto PY - 2020/06/25 Y2 - 2024/03/29 TI - Influence of teaching style and achievement motivation towards the results of learning services to volleyball JF - Health, sport, rehabilitation JA - HSR VL - 6 IS - 2 SE - Original articles. Sport DO - 10.34142/HSR.2020.06.02.06 UR - https://hsr-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/349 SP - 56-62 AB - <p><strong>The aim</strong> of this study was to determine the difference in influence between the command teaching style and inclusive teaching style on the results of service learning.</p><p><strong>Material and methods. </strong>This research is experimental research with a 2x2 factorial design. This research was conducted at Sukoharjo State Junior High School, Pringsewu Regency, Lampung Province. The implementation of the treatment of the volleyball service with Command Style and Inclusion Style teaching in Extracurricular students of Sukoharjo State Junior High School, Pringsewu Regency, Lampung Province. This research is an experimental study that aims to compare two different treatments to research subjects using factorial design techniques meaning that there are two factors studied. The research design used is the treatment design by level 2 x 2.</p><p><strong>Results.</strong> Based on the results of the research and the results of data analysis that have been done, the following conclusions can be obtained: 1) There is a significant difference in influence between the Komando teaching style and the teaching style of inclusion in improving service results on volleyball (p &lt;0.05). The effect of the command teaching style method is better than the inclusion teaching style in improving the service outcome of volleyball. 2) There is a significant difference in the results of service for volleyball between students who have high and low achievement motivation (p &lt;0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion.</strong> The results of service on volleyball in students who have high achievement motivation are better than those who have low achievement motivation. 3) There is no significant interaction effect between teaching style and achievement motivation on the results of service on volleyball (p&gt; 0.05).</p> ER -