System of control in the organization of pulmonary rehabilitation of persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease


Abstract views: 46 / PDF downloads: 33

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34142/HSR.2019.05.03.08

Keywords:

physical therapy, COPD, efficacy, International Classification of Functioning, ICF

Abstract

The aim: to substantiate the structural components of the control system aimed at improving the physical therapist’s work during pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) of COPD persons.

Materials and methods. Analysis and generalization of the data of the special scientific and methodological literature on the issues of physical therapy of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; method of analysis of medical records; elaboration of Internet sources, including databases of evidence based medical literature.

Results. The control system, which is reasonable to be implemented at three stages (preliminary, current, final) of the process of physical therapy (PT) and PR of patients with COPD, is substantiated.

The control system within the competence of the physical therapist provides for rehabilitation examination (preliminary control), monitoring (current control) and final evaluation of certain indicators. There were 5 groups of main indicators: quality of life/ activity and participation, disease course, body functions, body structures, educational competence. For the selected groups of indicators, the selection of measuring instruments was made, the features of their application at different stages were outlined, the values of the minimum clinically significant difference for the selected indicators were given.

Conclusions. The process of pulmonary rehabilitation of people with COPD needs to be evaluated and monitored for its effectiveness in accordance with the expected results.

The monitoring system allows to track all changes in the patient's health and functioning, regulate the intervention and its intensity, evaluate both the individual physical therapy session and the effectiveness of the entire program.

One of the criteria of the control system is the effectiveness of PT and PR, which is evaluated on the basis of the dynamics and direction of changes of the studied indicators, their compliance with the expected result and taking into account the values of the minimal clinically significant difference for the evaluated indicators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

K.A. Tymruk-Skoropad , Lviv State University of Physical Culture named after Ivan Boberskyj, Lviv, Ukraine

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-0435

tymruk.k@gmail.com

Lviv State University of Physical Culture named after Ivan Boberskyj,

Kostyushka str., 11, Lviv, Ukraine, 79007

Iu.O. Pavlova , Lviv State University of Physical Culture, Lviv, Ukraine

orcid.org/0000-0002-8111-4469

pavlova.j.o@gmail.com   

Lviv State University of Physical Culture

Kostyushka Str., 11, Lviv, Ukraine, 79007

 

M.A. Mazepa, Lviv State University of Physical Culture, Lviv, Ukraine

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2199-4791

mrmazepa@ukr.net

Lviv State University of Physical Culture,

Kostyushka Str., 11, Lviv, Ukraine, 79007

References

Tymruk-Skoropad K. Vykorystannia metodiv doslidzhennia v procesi legenevoi reabilitacii ta fizychnoi terapii osib z khronichnym obstruktyvnym zakhvoriuvanniam legen' (ogliad klinichnikh nastanov) [Use of research methods in the process of pulmonary rehabilitation and physical therapy of persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (review of clinical guidelines)]. Slobozhans'kij naukovo-sportivnij visnik. 2018;4(65):5–12. https://doi.org/10.15391/snsv.2018-4.001.

Tymruk-Skoropad KA. Metody doslidzhennia efektyvnosti fizychnoi terapii ta legenevoi reabilitacii osib z khronichnym obstruktyvnym zakhvoriuvanniam legen' (analiz sistematichnikh ogliadiv) [Methods of investigation of the effectiveness of physical therapy and pulmonary rehabilitation of persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (analysis of systematic reviews)]. Zdorov’ia, sport, reabilitaciia. 2018;4(4):148–57. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1468312.

Zeng Y, Jiang F, Chen Y, et al. Exercise assessments and trainings of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: A literature review. Int J COPD 2018; 13: 2013–2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S167098

Sivak О. Rozvytok systemi reabilitacii – odyn iz prioritetiv MOZ [Oksana Sivak: Development of the rehabilitation system is one of the priorities of the Ministry of Health] [Internet]. [cited 2019 Oct 11]. Available from: https://moz.gov.ua/article/news/oksana-sivak-rozvitok-sistemi-reabilitacii-–-odin-iz-prioritetiv-moz-.

Iak zminiuiet'sia systema reabilitacii v Ukraini [How does the rehabilitation system in Ukraine change] [Internet]. [cited 2019 Oct 11]. Available from: https://moz.gov.ua/article/news/jak-zminjuetsja-sistema-reabilitacii-v-ukraini

Novi posady i mul'tydisciplinarna komanda: MOZ Ukrainy prodovzhuie vprovadzhuvaty pidkhid dokazovoi reabilitacii [New posts and multidisciplinary team: Ministry of Health of Ukraine continues to implement an evidence-based rehabilitation approach] [Internet]. [cited 2019 Oct 11]. Available from: https://moz.gov.ua/article/news/novi-posadi-i-multidisciplinarna-komanda-moz-ukraini-prodovzhue-vprovadzhuvati-pidhid-dokazovoi-reabilitacii.

Uriad zatverdyv plan zakhodiv iz vprovadzhennia Mizhnarodnoi klasifikacii funkcionuvannia [The Government has approved a plan of action to implement the International Classification of Functioning] / Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy [Internet]. [cited 2019 Oct 11]. Available from: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/ua/news/uryad-zatverdiv-plan-zahodiv-z-vprovadzhennya-mizhnarodnoyi-klasifikaciyi-funkcionuvannya

MOZ zatverdyv pereklad Mizhnarodnoi klasifikacii funkcionuvannia [The Ministry of Health has approved the translation of the International Classification of Functioning] [Internet]. [cited 2019 Oct 11]. Available from: https://moz.gov.ua/article/news/moz-zatverdiv-pereklad-mizhnarodnoi-klasifikacii-funkcionuvannja.

Tymruk-Skoropad K, Stupnic'ka S, Pavlova Iu. Misce fizichnoi terapii v systemi legenevoi reabilitacii pry khronichnomu obstruktyvnomu zakhvoriuvanni legen' (analiz klinichnykh nastanov) [Place of physical therapy in the system of pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (analysis of clinical guidelines)]. Fizichne vikhovannia, sport i kul'tura zdorov’ia u suchasnomu suspil'stvi. 2018;2(42):126–34.

Zdorova shkola: aspekty monitoryngu [Healthy school: aspects of monitoring] / Shiian O, Pavlova Iu, Kudrik L, Sorokolit N, Mikitiuk O; Shiian O, editor. – Lviv: Kol'orove nebo, 2013. – 122 p.

Pavlova Iu. Ozdorovcho-rekreacijni tekhnologii ta iakist' zhittia liudiny: monografiia [Wellness and recreational technologies and quality of life: a monograph] / Iu. Pavlova. – Lviv: LSUPC, 2016. – 356 p.

Tymruk-Skoropad KA. Pervynne ociniuvannia ta planuvannia fizychnoi terapii paciientiv iz khronichnym obstruktyvnym zakhvoriuvanniam legen' z vykorystanniam instrumentiv na osnovi Mizhnarodnoi klasifikacii funkcionuvannia [Primary assessment and planning of physical therapy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using tools based on the International Classification of Functioning]. Fizichna aktivnist', zdorov’ia i sport. 2018;1(31):45–53.

Alma H, De Jong C, Jelusic D, et al. Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: Defining a minimal clinically important difference. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med; 26. Epub ahead of print 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.41.

Jones PW. St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire: MCID. COPD 2005; 2: 75–9.

Jones PW, Beeh KM., Chapman KR., et al. Minimal clinically important differences in pharmacological trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 189: 250–255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201310-1863PP.

Bestall J, Paul EA, Garrod R, et al. Usefulness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale as a measure of disability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1999; 54: 581–586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.54.7.581.

Kon SSC, Dilaver D, Mittal M, et al. The clinical COPD questionnaire: Response to pulmonary rehabilitation and minimal clinically important difference. Thorax 2014; 69: 793–798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204119.

Calverley PMA. Minimal clinically important difference--exacerbations of COPD. COPD 2005; 2: 143–8.

Donohue JF. Minimal clinically important differences in COPD lung function. COPD 2005; 2: 111–24.

Redelmeier DA, Goldstein RS, Min ST, et al. Spirometry and dyspnea in patients with COPD: When small differences mean little. Chest 1996; 109: 1163–1168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.109.5.1163.

Cazzola M, MacNee W, Martinez FJ, et al. Outcomes for COPD pharmacological trials: From lung function to biomarkers. Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 416–468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00099306.

Puhan MA, Chandra D, Mosenifar Z, et al. The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 784–790. http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00063810.

Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, et al. ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am Thorac Soc 2002; 166: 111–117.

Singh SJ, Jones PW, Evans R, et al. Minimum clinically important improvement for the incremental shuttle walking test. Thorax 2008; 63: 775–777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2007.081208.

Pepin V, Laviolette L, Brouillard C, et al. Significance of changes in endurance shuttle walking performance. Thorax 2011; 66: 115–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2010.146159.

Revill SM, Morgan MD, Singh SJ, et al. The endurance shuttle walk: a new field test for the assessment of endurance capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1999; 54: 213–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.54.3.213.

Benaim C, Blaser S, Léger B, et al. ‘Minimal clinically important difference’ estimates of 6 commonly-used performance tests in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completing a work-related multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20: 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2382-2.

Puhan MA, Frey M, Büchi S, et al. The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6: 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-6-46.

Smid DE, Franssen FM, Houben-Wilke S, et al. Responsiveness and MCID Estimates for CAT, CCQ, and HADS in Patients With COPD Undergoing Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Prospective Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017; 18: 53–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2016.08.002.

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: Рocket guide to COPD diagnosis, management, and prevention A Guide for Health Care Professionals, www.goldcopd.org (2019, accessed 28 May 2019).

Jones PW. Interpreting thresholds for a clinically significant change in health status in asthma and COPD. Eur Respir J 2002; 19: 398–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.02.00063702.

Mel'nikova EV, Bujlova TV, Bodrova RA, Shmonin AA, Mal'ceva MN, Ivanova GE. Ispol'zovanie mezhdunarodnoj klassifikacii funkcionirovaniia (MKF) v ambulatornoj i stacionarnoj medicinskoj reabilitacii: instrukciia dlia specialistov [Use of the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) in outpatient and inpatient medical rehabilitation: instruction for specialists]. Vestnik Vosstanovitel'noj mediciny. 2017;6(82):1219–28.

Bui K-L, Nyberg A, Maltais F, et al. Functional Tests in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Part 1: Clinical Relevance and Links to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017; 14: 778–784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201609-733AS.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-22

How to Cite

Tymruk-Skoropad , K., Pavlova , I., & Mazepa, M. (2019). System of control in the organization of pulmonary rehabilitation of persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health, Sport, Rehabilitation, 5(3), 69–79. https://doi.org/10.34142/HSR.2019.05.03.08

Issue

Section

Original articles. Physical therapy